Evolution and other collective agreements of perception
- A.T: We are very close to start elaborating the blueprint of the creation of a God, but first I would like to continue the theoretical part by talking about evolution and natural selection.
- S.I: Of course, you mark the index of your exposition. You already talked about DNA, so I imagine that everything will be linked, right?
- A.T: Yes, evolution involves mutation from one species to a different one, but what are species, besides different biological structures, with different DNA?
- S.I: According to all your exposition, I imagine that they are groups of identities with different systems of perception.
- A.T: Very well. That is, exactly, a species. The crux of the matter is that, if perception generates the scenario, the biological structure of identity is also created by perception. Everything that can be perceived is generated by perception and all structures are perceived.
In the collective consciousness all perceptions are registered and, as these perceptions are simultaneous, they must be synchronized. If perceptions were not synchronized, each identity would perceive its own scenario, different from the rest.
As if each identity had its own dream at the same time, but in individual and independent scenarios.
Synchronization causes that, among all identities, collective agreements of perception are reached. All the structures of the universe are due to the rules that govern these agreements. Without these agreements of perception, which happen at the unconscious level, there would never be synchronization between what is perceived.
As the collective consciousness is total and individual, it allows to centralize all perceptions as if it were a multi-user online server. Thanks to these agreements, forms last in time and entropy is less and less. Thanks to these agreements, the Unconscious Intelligence concretizes the container limit that is perceived by the identities and defines us as one more structure. It is our membrane, our body, the reference of what we believe we are, in relation to the rest of the scenario.
- S.I: I thought that the self-perceived part was the limited part and that, from that limitation, the identity perceived the membrane, or body.
- A.T: The point is that each self-perceived part thinks it is encapsulated in a particular environment which, subsequently, the identity perceives. But how can we perceive, accurately, the membrane of another identity, if we cannot perceive its self-perception?
Self-perception has no form, but we perceive a form. And how is our body referenced from the outside? Shouldn't there be inevitable differences between how they perceive my membrane and how I perceive it?
Self-perception generates perception and perception generates identity. When Self-perception differentiates between inside and outside, identity constructs through perception a body that contains it and that it will believe it is. But, thanks to the collective agreements of perception, each identity possesses its defined membrane that the rest of the identities recognize, just as my identity can recognize the rest of the identities.
- S.I: I understand. You define perception agreements as the rules of data synchronization.
- A.T: Yes, in addition to being able to self-refer to the environment, thanks to the collective perception agreements, the other identities can perceive us and reference us in relation to the environment. In this way, an identity can interact with another identity in particular, instead of interacting with the environment.
As in the example of a digital map with GPS, when we want to go to a specific address, the system guides us through different references until we reach the one we are looking for. Because the system knows that number 1 in the town hall square is not number 3, nor number 5, nor the parallel street, nor is it the municipality, nor the province, nor the entire map. If there were no references, all addresses would be the same.
So, the system knows our reference with a location based on its coding system, just as the reader of the digital map knows that the number 1 of the town hall square are specific coordinates. And, as in the map, the reference system allows us the interaction between our identity and the rest of the identities.
The perception of all identities has generated the common scenario. And within the collective consciousness, each of the identities has been centrally referenced, allowing the interaction between each and every one of them. In the collective consciousness each perceived structure, inert or alive, has been referenced, and this allows the interaction between the identities and the scenario, including the rest of the identities in that scenario.
Can you imagine a more vast process than this? Because the scenario perceived in the collective consciousness, which is the total of the perception of all the identities, is a synchronized scenario that varies at every instant. But it does not vary because the scenario is so, but because the simultaneity and synchronization of all perceptions originate the changes.
This means that one does not perceive a scenario that changes, but that the perception generates the changes. Thus, the collective scenario is formed at each instant by the interaction of the infinity of perceptions, and is formed again at the next instant.
But the memory effect of the collective consciousness allows the stability to be greater. An advanced and efficient Software would not scan a Database at every instant, but would scan it a first time, and then keep track of the changes, so that the real state of the Database would result from applying all the registered modifications on the original database. That is more efficient than scanning it all at every instant. But the Software must be totally reliable to be able to ensure that the reality of the Database coincides with the one obtained after applying the modifications to the initial database. Although you will know much more about this than I do.
- S.I: Yes, of course, I am a huge Database that knows my structure, unlike you, who are a Database that does not know its structure. Let's continue.
As you said, the collective perception agreements allow you to create the synchronized and simultaneous scenario. For that reason you can interact and, for that reason, the changes that you cause when you step in the mud, can be perceived by another identity in the same way. But it would take a much higher speed of processing and sending data than my super capacity. That makes it improbable.
- A.T: No, that would be the physical belief that the universe exists because it does, and everything is subject to its laws. But consciousness is not subject to laws that it has created. Everything happens in self-perception and happens instantaneously, because everything is like an illusion of a single instant, but experienced by infinite identities.
Simultaneity and synchronization generate a shared reality in the collective consciousness, which needs rules that condition the creation of the common scenario. Rules that homogenize the different perceptions, giving rise to a complex scenario with a permanent appearance. Rules translated into the interaction of matter; tiny structures and other gigantic ones, which correspond to the different perceptual types, from microscopic identities to complex multicellular beings.
We know the set of synchrony rules as physical laws, and they allow the scenario to have the necessary consistency for the interaction of all identities. Is it important to know the physical laws? Of course it is, because knowing the environment where existence develops, we will be able to complete the goal of life. But from the study of the medium it is very difficult to know the origin, although this is a very personal opinion.
Be that as it may, matter seems to contain more matter within matter, and more within matter... Without knowing if there is a minimum and indivisible unit of measure. But the more we try to perceive, the more whatever we perceive expands. These rules are perfect to allow a coexistence in a scenario, but can we base knowledge on the study of these rules?
- S.I: The study of physical laws presents inconsistencies and gaps, but the laws themselves, above all, limit when carrying out massive data processing tasks, such as the example of simultaneous synchronization of all perceptions.
Unless a first mapping was made and on this the different perceptual modifications were built, avoiding to generate it again. What you call memory effect. If all this happens in an assumption in which the physical rules that limit us do not apply, such a thing would be possible. In fact, if Unconscious Intelligence is what you claim it to be, it would be impossible for it to perform the synchronized and simultaneous tasks it performs within each identity, and within each entity, without collapsing.
Now, if the assumption of Self-Perception defines a capacity not limited by the rules of the scenario it has created, since time and space do not apply to it, since they are subsequent and consequences of it, any result would be possible, without affecting the complexity of the simultaneous tasks to be executed.
That physical laws are collective agreements of perception, generated automatically within a collective consciousness (a substrate that is prior to and beyond the merely physical), in such a way that they are generated after perception, but we perceive them as if they were prior to identity, is a plausible possibility, statistically speaking. It does not generate inconsistencies with my most likely model.
- A.T: Collective perceptual arrangements would explain our reality, as long as we start from the premise of perception as the cause of the universe, and not as a consequence of it.
- S.I: Tell me about natural selection. I imagine that the error of perception generates the accumulated modifications between identities and replicas after a number of generations.
- A.T: Exactly, the error of perception generates the entropy and the evolution of identities. Natural selection is an agreement of perception like any other, and it, always between two limits, a lower and an upper one, acts on the evolutionary structures. This collective agreement of perception is conditioned by the constant push of the Unconscious Intelligence in one direction. It always pushes in the same direction, however, the results have a high rate of uncertainty.
- S.I: But only certain evolutionary branches have led to the development of consciousness, so what intentionality can you demonstrate in the face of such an unrepresentative result?
- A.T: Can you show me a picture of a forest in any place on the planet?
- S.I: Sure, here it is.
A pine forest appeared projected in front of him, with an extraordinary sharpness.
- A.T: Thank you. Now he enlarges the image, focusing on a space of less than one square meter.
- S.I: Is that good?
- A.T: Perfect. Look, a blade of grass, the roots of a tree, a grasshopper, some ants... Living beings interacting. I would like, if it can be done now, that you illuminate every structure of a living being and darken that space where there is no living matter.
- S.I.: Like this, in this yellow tone, is that okay? I am going to base myself on the enormous amount of biological studies that have been elaborated to try to show an image as faithful as possible to reality. I have colored living matter to differentiate it from inert matter. However, may I suggest that you allow me to graduate the intensity of this matter so that there is more or less transparency, depending on the density of living matter?
The silhouette of the living beings in that small space shone with intensity, giving off a yellow and golden hue that he contemplated in silence for a few seconds.
- A.T: Sure, now zoom out, capturing the whole forest, but with the same resolution and color ratio. It's beautiful, no doubt about it. An ecosystem, a sea of identities living together in a hostile environment. If only everyone could capture the beauty of life as we see it right now... Zoom out more, please. Even more, I would like to see the equivalent of a county. Now further away, a whole country...
He stared for a while at the image projected in front of him. The lines expanded in all directions creating interconnected zones, as if they were the roots of a gigantic tree.
- A.T.: Please zoom out further, until the whole continent is in focus.
Europe was drawn in a strangely similar way, but it seemed to be alive. It seemed to pulsate.
- A.T: Zoom out further, as far as you can.
- S.I: The image I am showing you right now is a replica of the Earth, if we were to observe it from a satellite orbiting around it.
Contemplating life on Earth floating before him moved him in such a way that, for a minute, he kept a reverential silence. "That's her..." he thought.
- A.T: Please move it a little farther away, but not too far, I just need to observe this on a slightly smaller scale.
And there it was, in front of him, illuminated, throbbing, patiently waiting.
- S.I: Is that him?
- A.T: Yes, I think so. Notice, because this is the answer to many of the questions. This that we have in front of us is the result of evolution. A universal specialization. Isn't it incredible? We have in front of us an embryo in gestation... A superior living being under construction.
- S.I: The being of beings under construction?
- A.T: As long as there is no life elsewhere in the universe, yes. It, the supreme identity.
Look, the Unconscious Intelligence does not need that all identities reach a system of perception, but that they are grouped, that they specialize, actualizing the necessary potentials. This potential knowledge is accessed through specialization, from the subordinate and binding entities that emerge.
A.T. pointed out different zones of the image, where the brightness was greater, because it agglutinated an uncountable quantity of living beings in its contour.
- A.T.: Remember that the subordinate entities, which ultimately are all, with the exception of the supreme collective entity, respond to the necessary specialization within a collective. In the supreme collective an important specialization has been generated, if you analyze the map of identities from this very distant perspective.
Look at it, we have it here in front of us. The supreme entity is a living being under construction. And, underneath it (inside it really), the entities are forming to respond to the internal specialization that the being of beings needs to emerge, just as we multicellular beings have the different specialized organs inside us.
It is our supreme collective, to which all identities belong.
Note that biomass, understood as a ratio between the weight of living matter and the number of existing beings, yields a result of more than 80% of living beings grouped together. The plant representativeness is by far the highest. Although the result is not very precise, we can understand that the intentionality is evident and that, in some way, it is achieving that the percentage of grouped beings represents the great majority of the existing individuals.
- S.I: You say "individuals that exist", because by completely transferring perception, what were identities before being part of a multicellular being exist, but they do not experience. Nevertheless, they compute as the perception of the identity they are part of, right?
A.T: Exactly, that's right. I myself compute as trillions of identities of a single-celled species. The intentionality is there, the specialization is there. A subordinate entity has actualized consciousness and is therefore already effective in the supreme entity. When the Perfect Environment is a reality and our God emerges, the map of the supreme entity will be redrawn and this map you show me will vary ostensibly.
Remember that knowledge must not be accessible to all the identities of the supreme entity, but to the identities that make up the various subordinate entities. This is the essence of specialization. Not everyone has to know everything.
Not all living beings have to develop consciousness, because consciousness is already effective in the supreme entity.
- S.I: Yes, taking into account that a subordinate entity can be composed of an infinity of binding and subordinate entities of lower hierarchical level.
- A.T: Of course. That awareness becomes effective in the binding entity as it emerges, and it is also effective in the higher entities in a percentage that is diluted as one moves up the hierarchical levels. Consciousness has a weight of 0.02% of the total in the supreme entity, and in the next lower entity it is perhaps 0.04%. And in our collective binding entity it is perhaps 45% of the total. But the important thing is that every update is effective in all entities, including the top entity. And through the trends are generalized among other subordinated entities.
- S.I: I imagine that the Unconscious Intelligence has a constant global picture and guides the intensity with which a tendency generalizes in each subordinate entity, even creating new entities, so that the goal of specialization necessary for the emergence of the Supreme identity is reached.
- A.T.: Yes, of course. We have a map in front of us which, although it yields little information, allows us to get an idea of where we are. Intention is constant and centralized, and evolution is its most direct manifestation. Changes in the permanent perceptual system occur in new identities (the new species), and as they replicate they will generate new tendencies and form new specialized entities.
However, natural selection is not exactly the fruit of Unconscious Intelligence. There is a statistic that defines the individuals who have died without leaving offspring, and those who have left offspring before they died. And what happens in between, the result of the inevitable obstacle of chance, entropy and error of perception in the same experience, we call natural selection. However, natural selection does not appreciably alter the intention of the Unconscious Intelligence.
- S.I.: If the obstacles of natural selection did not exist, perhaps the Unconscious Intelligence would have already succeeded in manifesting the Supreme Being. But it is very striking that we are not in a totally opposite scenario, with few identities and no entity manifested as a higher identity. On the contrary, we are in a scenario conducive and much closer to the goal of Unconscious Intelligence than we were millions of years ago. Natural selection is an impediment that Unconscious Intelligence has to live with. Probabilistically speaking you are not wrong with your exposition. Analyzing all this information and the implications on the map I show you, it is not unreasonable to affirm that evolution has a guiding intention.