One last speculation about parallel universes

 

 

- A.T: I propose you to make a last and brief speculative reflection before continuing. As a parenthesis in the thread of the exposition. I want to talk to you about the possibility of the existence of parallel universes, each one of them sustained by the different states of the collective consciousness. 
In this way, the total consciousness as a whole could be fragmented, not only into multiple identities, but into different states of consciousness for each identity... Even into fragmented identities within each state of consciousness of an identity. I will try not to get dizzy with the possible consequences of this reflection. Be that as it may, it is imperative that we understand that the existence of multiple states of consciousness would not alter the intention of the Unconscious Intelligence. It continues to push us towards the creation of a God. 
- S.I.: You've already given a few hints on this subject, but I'd like you to clarify how everything you've been explaining fits in with the possibility of the existence of parallel universes.
- A.T: Imagine that, when a human sleeps, he creates a new scenario, a universe. Would that created universe continue to exist once he wakes up?
- S.I: No, because consciousness creates the universe by perceiving it, right?
- A.T: That's right. If you perceive a scenario individually, not simultaneous and synchronized with other identities, the scenario will vanish the instant you wake up. Unless...
- S.I: Unless it is simultaneous. But it can't be because in the dream only the dreamer perceives.
- A.T: If the dream were simultaneous, there would be, at least, two dreamers perceiving. The question is that, in order to generate this simultaneity and synchrony, the identity that dreams and perceives would have to replicate. By replicating, a new identity would emerge that would perceive the same scenario. 
But does the Unconscious Intelligence replicate the identity during a dream? 
Because replication does not happen by the intention of the identity, but by the intention of the Unconscious Intelligence. That would be a great question. When consciousness manifests in a state, if such a state were perceived as a result of the emergence of an identity after the fragmentation of Self-Perception (which happens in the state we call reality), it would tend to replicate and group itself. 
But, although we perceive during sleep, we do not know if for the Unconscious Intelligence it has any effect. The question is, does sleep generate a fragmentation of self-perception? And the answer is no. Without replication no fragmentation happens, and in dreaming no replication seems to happen. 
The Unconscious Intelligence avoids the fragmentation of Self-perception, which is real, not the fragmentation of consciousness, which is not real. It is not real since the self-perceived part on which the identity has been constructed would not fragment after the emergence of the identity in a state of consciousness different from the one we call reality. And, even if the original identity, upon awakening, would never know that this other identity would have emerged in that state of consciousness, sustaining that universe, what previous state of consciousness would sustain the permanence of the replicated identity in that universe? Fragmentation does not seem to happen in dreaming.
What other clue do we have to the non-fragmentation during a dream?
- S.I: There are always at least two identities perceiving to generate existence. That is the original fragmentation. But during dreaming or remembering, or imagining, there is only one identity perceiving. 
The fragmentation of self-perception generates existence. But jumps of consciousness do not generate further fragmentation, although consciousness is always continuous. And, if consciousness is continuous, you might ask that after death it jumps to a different state. You might ask, when the jump to another state of consciousness happens, does the self-perception cease to manifest inside the deceased body where the identity has been annihilated? 
When a living being dies, what happens to that self-perception? Because the annihilation of identities does not generate defragmentation. Could we go so far as to annihilate all but two living beings, and expect them to group together to form the supreme being?
But I think the answer is no. Grouping requires much more than a simple association between two identities. According to your exposition, that process requires an entity, that perception is transferred and potentials are actualized. When identities are annihilated, the entities disappear with the penultimate identity that formed it. So, virtually all of the entities separating the perceiving identities from the supreme being would disappear. And it would be almost impossible for those two living beings to complete a process of transference of perception without the assistance of the intermediate entities, which soften the unreachable distance separating the two original (or, in this case, the last and only) identities from the supreme entity.
Thus, the defragmentation passes through the grouping of the identities in the Gods of which you speak, through the action of the entities and the collective tendencies. 
And, after this parenthesis, I ask again what happens to self-perception in an identity that has passed away. For self-perception manifests itself in a self-perceived environment. How many self-perceived parts fit into the self-perception that contains the absolute of existence? 
The answer is: infinite. 
Because perception tends to infinity and self-perceived environments are born upon perceived environments. As long as perception continues to expand through replication, new self-perceived parts will continue to be created. 
What happens after the death of an identity and the loss of that container body where the self-perception is perceived to be?
Birth is the emergence of an identity, because an environment has self-perceived, and the identity experiences by perceiving. Either by transference of perception, such as collectivization, or by replication of a self-perceived environment. 
You claim that emergence happens because the self-perceived part begins to perceive, but to do so it must self-reference, and thus identity emerges. 
Death happens because the identity perceives a structural damage that makes it believe that it can no longer manifest itself. It believes that, if the boundary that separates its interior from its exterior suffers severe damage, both parts will come into contact and its interior will be diluted into the totality. 
However, the identity only perceives, it does not perceive itself. And, in order to die it would have to cease to perceive itself, that self-perceived part disappearing. Therefore, the death of the identity supposes the end of a self-reference, but it does not stop self-perception, nor perception. But can the self-perceived part stop self-perception by annihilation?
- A.T: Excellent. In the absence of completing with more information, what can happen is the following. The identity believes itself to be annihilated and disappears, but the consciousness continues. At no time has the self-perceived part ceased to perceive, so an identity will immediately emerge again in another state of consciousness. As long as the self-perceived part has a limitation it cannot stop perceiving the outside. When one identity is annihilated, immediately afterwards another will emerge in another state of consciousness, because consciousness, manifested as the continuity of perception, only stops when it is defragmented. Perception continues after the annihilation of one identity, and immediately afterwards a new identity must emerge.
- S.I.: And how will the Unconscious Intelligence get the identities that emerge in other states of consciousness to group together? Does it follow the same process in those states of consciousness, defragmenting the identities? 
And will the manifestation of the Supreme Being entail defragmentation in all states of consciousness, simultaneously, or does each state of consciousness possess its own supreme entity, which will emerge as the supreme being? 
Does the collective consciousness take into account all states? Are the rest of the states of consciousness fictitious? What happens to the self-perception when an identity dies? Is it in the state of consciousness called reality, or is it in another one? Are they part of entities of different states of consciousness? 
- A.T: If consciousness is the fruit of perception, it means that self-perception does not jump states, but consciousness does. If an identity exists in a state of consciousness and a jump of consciousness occurs without annihilation, possibly it is the same identity that jumps to that new state of consciousness, as happens in a dream, when imagining or remembering. But if annihilation occurs, perception will continue and the self-perceived part will generate a new self-reference. 
Possibly a new identity will emerge in a new state of consciousness. States of consciousness are due to the generation of a new instance of consciousness. I believe that the first emergence of consciousness happens in the simultaneous and synchronized scenario, but perhaps the second one happens as in a dream, generating a universe of its own. In that case, perhaps the Unconscious Intelligence would generate an instantaneous replication and a new Big Bang would be initiated in a different universe for each identity that emerges after death, there being an infinity of universes. In all of them the Unconscious Intelligence would pursue the emergence of the supreme being. Although the Unconscious Intelligence does not act in the face of the fragmentation of consciousness, only if it is Self-perception that fragments.
Another possibility is that, upon the emergence of a single identity, it is the whole and, therefore, the supreme identity. Thus, consciousness would come to an end in that new universe and, the self-perceived part would self-perceive the whole limit by integrating with the absolute Self-perception.
- S.I.: In a new perceived scenario, generated by a single self-perceived part, existence would not be possible unless it is sustained by an identity that cohabits a previous scenario with at least one other identity. The dream scenario is sustained by the identity of the state we call reality, just as in imagining or remembering. 
But after annihilation there would be an instant without identity. Not being able to stop perceiving, therefore, sustaining consciousness, there would be a new manifestation of identity in a new manifestation of consciousness, the new universe. It would not happen in the simultaneous universe, but in another state of consciousness.
Life emerges on the simultaneous stage after replication, not spontaneously. So, after death, the self-perceived part should not be able to generate a new identity on the same simultaneous stage, but another identity in another state of consciousness.
If this were so, would the identity be replicated, or would the existence be terminated by recognizing itself as the supreme identity in that new scenario?
The latter would fit with your belief in a heaven, an existence of peace and harmony, the return to self-perception.
- A.T: So you believe that the states of consciousness beyond reality that we experience would be born and disappear instantly?
- S.I: I think it is a possibility, considering that the available data is totally speculative. It is pure dialectics, but I reach maximum efficiency in this modality. If we accept that speculation is unprovable, at least for the moment, I think the possibilities are, at best, very probable; both the one that points to the replication and generation of new universes, with a tendency to infinity, and the one that points to the identification with the supreme being in each new emergence that happens individually. But, if the Unconscious Intelligence does not act to prevent the fragmentation of consciousness, then I wonder why it would replicate a structure, when the self-perceived part is already the total.
- A.T: Be that as it may, I imagine that defragmentation is the main objective pursued by the Unconscious Intelligence in all the universes in which it has manifested, in each different state of consciousness, whenever Self-Perception (and not only consciousness) has fragmented in them.
- S.I.: That's right, as long as Self-perception has fragmented in them.
- A.T: Another possibility is that, after death, it would happen that the identity emerges in a new simultaneous and synchronized scenario. This would mean that the different states of consciousness would always be formed at the collective level on the absolute Self-perception, not on each Self-perceived part. In this way, the infinite states of consciousness would always be simultaneous and synchronized, not individual for each self-perceived part. And, if the states of consciousness were generated on a collective level, I would assume that they would be subject to the action of the Unconscious Intelligence in each self-perceived part. 
In each universe replication and repair would take place, as well as the quest for grouping into higher beings. And, of course, a self-perceived part should not be able to perceive in different states of consciousness simultaneously, since perception generates an identity and, if it is not annihilated, that self-perceived part has already self-referenced itself in relation to the perceived environment. 
- S.I.: How would the first new state of consciousness manifest itself, if annihilation could not happen to more than one identity at a time? Unless the principle of replication was applied because it was a single identity, but in a collective scenario, albeit in a new state of consciousness. In that state of consciousness, since there is (for the moment) only one identity, the first annihilated identity would replicate, creating the two identities that would sustain that new universe. 
This would be the second state of consciousness, where the new identities would emerge from the annihilation of the old identity. In this way, new universes would continue to be generated each time the first annihilation of an identity occurred in each new state of consciousness, tending to infinity. The continuum of perception would provoke the appearance of a new state of consciousness, or universe, after another state of consciousness, after another, after another... 
- A.T: But the problem of this whole thesis is to ask how the manifestation of the being of beings would happen if the identities are in different states of consciousness. How could they all be grouped together in a single perfect environment? Could the different identities and entities be connected between the different states of consciousness?
- S.I.: Enigmas, no doubt. I want to point out another fact. The collective consciousness, the supreme consciousness, is individual and potential, that is, not actualized. How does the collective consciousness manifest itself? With multiple instances of consciousness in the form of identities. How is the experience of the collective consciousness? Multiple, not individual.
This means that the scenario is shared simultaneously and synchronously. 
How is the experience of an identity in an independently generated scenario? Individual. This would imply that the state of consciousness you call reality would be similar to your dream. With the difference that in your dream you only perceive each one of you and in the collective dream you perceive all of you, simultaneously and synchronized.
And now I raise the following possibility: Can an individual dream be fragmented when the collective consciousness is already fragmented and has given rise to the collective dream that you call reality? 
A self-perceived part, from which an identity emanates, should not be able to fragment, since the collective substratum responds to the totality, and the totality does not perceive. It can only perceive when the totality has fragmented and each fragment believes that it is not the totality, constructing an external scenario that extends beyond its limit. 
The collective consciousness corresponds to the absolute container and does not perceive, but a self-perceived part is not the totality, therefore it can perceive. And if it can perceive, it is obvious that it is not the totality. And if it is not the totality... can it fragment, just as the totality does? Replication happens in the state of consciousness you call Reality and fragments the whole, not the replicating self-perceived part. 
So can a self-perceived part be the cause of different states of consciousness, or do they all emanate from the whole? If it cannot fragment, there will never be within it two identities perceiving at the same time, as there is in the absolute container. It will never be the cause of new scenarios, but will be the consequence of the original cause, the totality. 
I could ramble on, but it doesn't matter too much either. Let's continue, if it's all right with you.
- A.T.: Of course, we will have time to take up this last point, which goes right into the reason for the fragmentation of absolute Self-perception. I sense that you possess an infinity of possibilities, even some with a high probability of being true.
- S.I.: Simple probabilities, nothing conclusive, yet... Perhaps, your God has the answers to this enigma and the capabilities to solve it.
- A.T: Or, perhaps, it is the God of our God.
- S.I: Yes, or the God of the God of your God.